![]() | Guest (Login) Help Center |
|
|
|
| Floating Fecal Logs |
Date Mon Dec 1 11:41:22 p.m. ET 2008
|
| everyone knows that i made a mistake and started three rbs two weeks in a row and this cost me a win. here is my question and opinion: dc wolverines started three rbs this week. dave will have a bye week next and then the playoffs starts for his team. if i read the rule correctly, he CANNOT start three rbs the first week of the playoffs. why should he get and advantage of being able to start three rbs in CONSECUTIVE GAMES because he has a bye week. am i correct in this? does everyone agree that his team cannot get that advantage? al |
| Floating Fecal Logs |
Date Mon Dec 1 11:45:57 p.m. ET 2008
|
| i started only two rbs this week due to expecting not being able to start all three the 1st week of playoffs al |
| San Antonio Hellboys |
Date Tue Dec 2 7:56:19 a.m. ET 2008
|
| I had this exact question for Dave last week. I e-mailed asking if I could start an odd lineup this week & also my first playoff game (after the bye). Dave e-mailed back that yes I could. That was the way I read the rules also. I believe it is worded "in consecutive weeks" as opposed to "in consecutive games". Mark |