![]() | Guest (Login) Help Center |
|
4YOU PLAYMAKERS LEAGUE |
| Vultures |
Date Thu Oct 15 10:55:39 a.m. ET 2009
|
| #1- I predict this week, I will beat Nasty Boys score by over 50 points, and I will get into the 170's. #2- Brew City will wallop Oregan and beat him by at least 30 points. #3- Prairie will edge out Tennessee in a close matchup and win by less than 10 points. #4- Lancaster Ligtening will use the wrong RB's out of his slew of washed up oldies', for a lower score than needed, like every week, and get edged out by House toppers by less than 15 points. No offense intended lancaster, but considering you haven't even used your top RB of the year yet, and he's the top one having already had his bye. #5- Dragon Slayers will slay Vinny by a score of over 30 points. #6- Ghosts will barely pull off a close one over brownies by less than 10 points. Anyone care to wager on any of these? |
| Ghosts |
Date Thu Oct 15 11:28:49 a.m. ET 2009
|
| WOW, what a compliment to Brownies. I am averaging 139 points a game and Brownies topped out at 127. Somebody is getting a little brown on his nose; are you trying to trade all your picks for P. Manning to get back up to five QBs again this year. Then again we're discussing the opinion of somebody that is still holding on to C. Schilens. Actually based on matchups I'll take Nasty for the upset over Vultures. I'll score my usual 130+ and Brownies will have to match Closest game will be Prairie and Tennessee Biggest win to Dragons Most points in Matchup will be Brew over Oregon Finally I'll take Lightning over House |
| Vultures |
Date Thu Oct 15 11:38:17 a.m. ET 2009
|
| One slighty huge problem with you that much over brownies. Donald Brown-Bye Ronnie Brown-Bye Mike Bell-Backup Fred Jackson-Backup that leaves you only 1 RB to use this week. Michael Crabtree-Bye Reggie Wayne-Bye Calvin Johnson- Probably won't play, injured. that leaves 3 WR's Ocho Cino, Bowe, and Welker Where does your other spot come from, someone who won't play? Or someone who might play for 2 plays a game and get you 1 point with Jackson, Bell or Johnson???? If your 2 best players weren't on a bye, Brown and Wayne, you might be able to pick up the slack with one of them, but it will be tough being short a player. I can help you out though, will offer chaz schilens, who will play this week, in exchange for Reggie Wayne. My predictions stand. |
| Ghosts |
Date Thu Oct 15 1:34:12 p.m. ET 2009
|
| Child please... Schilens is a nothing, won't play this week, probably won't catch a single pass this year. Out of all those guys you took the time to list R. Brown and R. Wayne are the only starters doing anything. Johnson hasn't done anything so even if he doesn't play the eight points can be picked up by Bowe. That leaves one hole in my lineup filled by Bell who will start for the injured P. Thomas (if you kept up on your news you'd know that and you'd know the Raiders suck). So as I said before I'll score my usual 130+ points and Brownie will be forced to match, which would be a high for him, and if he does then it'll just be week 4 for me all over again. In case you can't figure it out: Rivers 25 Lynch 20 Bell 15 Bowe 10 Cinco 20 Welker 15 Miller 10 Scobee 5 Philly 10 Total 130 Watching the Raiders suck despite having superman Chaz Schilens... Priceless |
| Nasty Boys |
Date Thu Oct 15 6:39:08 p.m. ET 2009
|
| Hey Vultures why the love for the Raiders WR's? DHB and now Chaz, has Russell thrown for over 100 yards in a game yet? Russell's top 2 options are Miller and Murphy so that sure don't leave too many yards for anyone else. Here's a guarantee for ya not only will you not beat me by 50, but I'll beat you. |
| Vultures |
Date Tue Oct 20 8:55:14 a.m. ET 2009
|
| Well in my sad sad day of predictions, I couldn't have been farther off from the truth, especially my own, getting beat by over 50 points. The only predictions I was spot on was that lancaster wouldn't use his only RB who still has legs and can put up fantasy points, and in turn he would make the wrong decision. Don't worry I'll make better predictions next week. |